Monday, April 30, 2012
Slaughterhouse-Five: Overall Reflection
I really enjoyed this book the whole way through. The frequent flashes to different points in time in Billy's memory were really entertaining for me. In addition to this, I really enjoyed the overall message the book had. It didn't have a polarizing view on war, but rather a balanced one that brought about certain aspects of it in social commentary. Vonnegut really portrayed the horrors of war in a different light that I was not used to. I really enjoyed this, even if it was revealed to me through unrealistic techniques. So overall, I would say that this and Frankenstein were my favorite works of the year. I'm glad I chose this book and am also glad to be finished with these blogs.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Happiest Moment
"Later on in life, the Tralfamadorians would advise Billy to concentrate on the happy moments of his life, and to ignore the unhappy ones- to stare only at pretty things as eternity failed to go by. If this sort of selectivity had been possible for Billy, he might have chosen as his happiest moment his sundrenched snooze in the back of the wagon." p.195
I think this quote reveals a lot about the work. The war has just ended. In this moment, Billy describes it as the happiest time in his life. He isn't doing anything but sleeping, yet he is happy. Through this, I think Vonnegut is stressing the significance of peace. Billy's attitude towards the newly discovered sense of peace contrasts the horrors of war. If doing nothing but experiencing peace can be the happiest moment in someone's life, war must then be horrible. Maybe I just looked too deeply into this quote, but I really think that is what the author is trying to convey through it. I'm interested to see whether others agree or disagree with my interpretation of Billy's description.
I think this quote reveals a lot about the work. The war has just ended. In this moment, Billy describes it as the happiest time in his life. He isn't doing anything but sleeping, yet he is happy. Through this, I think Vonnegut is stressing the significance of peace. Billy's attitude towards the newly discovered sense of peace contrasts the horrors of war. If doing nothing but experiencing peace can be the happiest moment in someone's life, war must then be horrible. Maybe I just looked too deeply into this quote, but I really think that is what the author is trying to convey through it. I'm interested to see whether others agree or disagree with my interpretation of Billy's description.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Extended Metaphor
"Trout, incidentally, had written a book about a money tree. It had twenty-dollar bills for leaves. Its flowers were government bonds. Its fruit was diamonds. It attracted human beings who killed each other around the roots and made very good fertilizer. So it goes." p.167
The quote above is an extended metaphor for war. The metaphor above is a book written by Trout which describes the nature of war. This is yet another one of Vonnegut's social commentaries that communicate the overall meaning of the work. In the metaphor, each part of the tree represents a part of the cycle between greed and war. Both are related and dependent upon each other to exist. The greedy people who kill each other for the fruit of the tree, in turn, end up fertilizing the tree to bear more fruit for more greedy humans to seek after. Vonnegut describes the nature of war through this metaphor, which I found very powerful and profound in meaning. Through it, he is able to communicate his own personal views on the origins of war and also the inhumanities that exist within it derived from greed.
The quote above is an extended metaphor for war. The metaphor above is a book written by Trout which describes the nature of war. This is yet another one of Vonnegut's social commentaries that communicate the overall meaning of the work. In the metaphor, each part of the tree represents a part of the cycle between greed and war. Both are related and dependent upon each other to exist. The greedy people who kill each other for the fruit of the tree, in turn, end up fertilizing the tree to bear more fruit for more greedy humans to seek after. Vonnegut describes the nature of war through this metaphor, which I found very powerful and profound in meaning. Through it, he is able to communicate his own personal views on the origins of war and also the inhumanities that exist within it derived from greed.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Balance
"She asked Gluck if he wasn't awfully young to be in the army. He admitted that he was. She asked Edgar Derby if he wasn't awfully old to be in the army. He said he was." p.159
I found this quote very interesting. It seems as though the author is making a direct social commentary on the war and the nature of war in general. It is apparent that Slaughterhouse-Five is written as an anti-war book. This quote above really reflects the book's nature in its comments regarding the issue with society and war. The answers Gluck and Derby give in response to the question, to me, sound like Vonnegut's protest of the way society sees war. Both men know that they don't belong in the war because they are unfit at both ends of the age spectrum. I don't think it was coincidence that Derby and Gluck both represent these age demographics. Through utilizing balance the author was able to convey the importance of the message seen in the quote above. In it, I think Vonnegut is protesting how society treats people and forces them into situations in which they don't belong. However, these men had to face the reality of society's demand and fight for their country even though they knew they were unfit to. This idea seems to be present throughout the book and adds to its overall anti-war message.
I found this quote very interesting. It seems as though the author is making a direct social commentary on the war and the nature of war in general. It is apparent that Slaughterhouse-Five is written as an anti-war book. This quote above really reflects the book's nature in its comments regarding the issue with society and war. The answers Gluck and Derby give in response to the question, to me, sound like Vonnegut's protest of the way society sees war. Both men know that they don't belong in the war because they are unfit at both ends of the age spectrum. I don't think it was coincidence that Derby and Gluck both represent these age demographics. Through utilizing balance the author was able to convey the importance of the message seen in the quote above. In it, I think Vonnegut is protesting how society treats people and forces them into situations in which they don't belong. However, these men had to face the reality of society's demand and fight for their country even though they knew they were unfit to. This idea seems to be present throughout the book and adds to its overall anti-war message.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Imagery
"He was enchanted by the architecture of the city. Merry amoretti wove garlands above windows. Roguish fauns and naked nymphs peeked down at Billy from festooned cornices. Stone monkeys frisked among scrolls and seashells and bamboo." p.150
Vonnegut uses very vivid imagery in this quote that stuck out to me. Most of the structure of the book is of simple and dull language. However, this quote reveals an upbeat and energetic description of the city of Dresden. The quote reflects Billy's attitude upon his arrival to the city. One thing that I find interesting and a little confusing is why Vonnegut described Dresden in this manner. Was this not the place of the death of 130,000 people? I don't understand why he would describe it like this unless he is using it as a paradox to contrast the horrors that took place there. It really didn't seem like this to me, so I wonder what other's think of such a vivid and happy description of the city where such horrible things took place.
Vonnegut uses very vivid imagery in this quote that stuck out to me. Most of the structure of the book is of simple and dull language. However, this quote reveals an upbeat and energetic description of the city of Dresden. The quote reflects Billy's attitude upon his arrival to the city. One thing that I find interesting and a little confusing is why Vonnegut described Dresden in this manner. Was this not the place of the death of 130,000 people? I don't understand why he would describe it like this unless he is using it as a paradox to contrast the horrors that took place there. It really didn't seem like this to me, so I wonder what other's think of such a vivid and happy description of the city where such horrible things took place.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Slaughterhouse-Five: Personal Reflection
Overall, I have really enjoyed reading this book so far. It is definitely very unique and different from the rest of the works we've read this year, or really anything I've ever read for that matter. To me, that's a good thing. Vonnegut's frequent anecdotes and rapid transitions to different settings in time really hooked me as a reader. I found this book especially hard to put down to do these blogs. For about the first time ever, I've actually read a little ahead simply because I want to know what happens. I'm really interested to see how the book unfolds and to understand the key themes Vonnegut reveals in it. So far, this is actually one of my favorite books I've ever read, and I really hope I enjoy the second half as much as the first.
Slaughterhouse-Five: "So it Goes"
"After Edgar Derby, the high school teacher, was shot in Dresden later on, a doctor pronounced him dead and snapped his dogtag in two. So it goes." p.92
This is probably the one hundredth time "so it goes" has been written so I figured I'd give it a well-deserved blog. Obviously, with this being repeated so often, it is connected somehow with the theme. So far from the story, I haven't been able to identify a key theme, but I really think this reoccurring phrase has some connection. It really captures the laid-back atmosphere within the progression of the story. Everything seems to be happening almost without care. Billy seems to have no control on the actions in his own life as he drifts through time. The phrase "so it goes" influences the reader to come to understand things in the way Billy perceives them. It implies that everything must be taken as it is because it simply does not change. I hope this analysis is on the right track. I'm interested to see what other's thought of the repetition of this phrase.
This is probably the one hundredth time "so it goes" has been written so I figured I'd give it a well-deserved blog. Obviously, with this being repeated so often, it is connected somehow with the theme. So far from the story, I haven't been able to identify a key theme, but I really think this reoccurring phrase has some connection. It really captures the laid-back atmosphere within the progression of the story. Everything seems to be happening almost without care. Billy seems to have no control on the actions in his own life as he drifts through time. The phrase "so it goes" influences the reader to come to understand things in the way Billy perceives them. It implies that everything must be taken as it is because it simply does not change. I hope this analysis is on the right track. I'm interested to see what other's thought of the repetition of this phrase.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Anecdotes
"Overhead he heard the cry of what might have been, a melodious owl, but it wasn't a melodious owl, It was a flying saucer from Tralfamadore, navigating in both space and time, therefore seeming to Billy Pilgrim to have come from nowhere at once." p.75
I'm beginning to question whether Billy is simply insane or this is supposed to be actually happening. I know a mental hospital was referenced somewhere in the text which led me to question this. However, it seems to be what is actually supposed to be happening though. This excerpt is yet another anecdote shared within the frame story. Billy's life jumps from places in time at random. Thus, the book also follows this pattern, giving the reader various insights to his life through the frequent and wide-ranging anecdotes. I'm actually enjoying all these frequent shifts in settings and events. The book has very unique structure in regards to the way it changes from time periods in Billy's life, yet is somehow actually the present. I don't understand it, but I'm also not crazy like Billy seems to be.
I'm beginning to question whether Billy is simply insane or this is supposed to be actually happening. I know a mental hospital was referenced somewhere in the text which led me to question this. However, it seems to be what is actually supposed to be happening though. This excerpt is yet another anecdote shared within the frame story. Billy's life jumps from places in time at random. Thus, the book also follows this pattern, giving the reader various insights to his life through the frequent and wide-ranging anecdotes. I'm actually enjoying all these frequent shifts in settings and events. The book has very unique structure in regards to the way it changes from time periods in Billy's life, yet is somehow actually the present. I don't understand it, but I'm also not crazy like Billy seems to be.
Slaughterhouse-Five: Indirect Characterization
"Billy is spastic in time, has no control over where he is going next, and the trips aren't necessarily fun. He is in a constant state of stage fright, he says, because he never knows what part of his life he is going to have to act in next... He was a funny-looking child who became a funny-looking youth-tall and weak." p.23
One thing that is prevalent in the book is indirect characterization. Vonnegut contributes the traits of characters largely through descriptions of events and circumstances. Throughout the story, almost all of Billy's character has been developed through the actions that have happened to him. However, I chose this quote for a specific purpose. Vonnegut describes Billy as being in a constant state of stage fright. This brief characterization of him as being perpetually frightened has yet to be shown so far in the frame story. So far, it seems as though Billy has accepted time travel as a normal thing that happens and is yet to protest or fear such things. As of now, he seems to just have a "so it goes" attitude towards the happenings of events in his life. I'm interested to see how Billy's views of such things change throughout the book up to the present in which Vonnegut is telling the story.
One thing that is prevalent in the book is indirect characterization. Vonnegut contributes the traits of characters largely through descriptions of events and circumstances. Throughout the story, almost all of Billy's character has been developed through the actions that have happened to him. However, I chose this quote for a specific purpose. Vonnegut describes Billy as being in a constant state of stage fright. This brief characterization of him as being perpetually frightened has yet to be shown so far in the frame story. So far, it seems as though Billy has accepted time travel as a normal thing that happens and is yet to protest or fear such things. As of now, he seems to just have a "so it goes" attitude towards the happenings of events in his life. I'm interested to see how Billy's views of such things change throughout the book up to the present in which Vonnegut is telling the story.
Slaughter-House-Five: Frame Story
"I've finished my war book now. The next one I write is going to be fun. This one is a failure, and had to be, since it was written by a pillar of salt. It begins like this:..." p.22
This quote illuminates the set up of the book Slaughterhouse-Five. Just like Frankenstein, the majority of the plot is a frame story. The author is the first-person narrator of the story who is writing a book relating to his past experience from World War 2. The main character is introduced as Billy, who I plan on highlighting in the next blog. To go off on a personal rant, I really enjoy frame story formats for some reason. It's like there's always action happening inside and outside of what is the perceived present. Anyway, this story has a unique structure that constantly jumps around with Billy's time travel. I have found it very interesting thus far, as the frame story and frequent anecdote format has kept me hooked on reading it. One thing that I want to learn in group discussion tomorrow is that if Kurt Vonnegut is supposed to be the actual narrator of the story since I think I may have missed it awhile back.
This quote illuminates the set up of the book Slaughterhouse-Five. Just like Frankenstein, the majority of the plot is a frame story. The author is the first-person narrator of the story who is writing a book relating to his past experience from World War 2. The main character is introduced as Billy, who I plan on highlighting in the next blog. To go off on a personal rant, I really enjoy frame story formats for some reason. It's like there's always action happening inside and outside of what is the perceived present. Anyway, this story has a unique structure that constantly jumps around with Billy's time travel. I have found it very interesting thus far, as the frame story and frequent anecdote format has kept me hooked on reading it. One thing that I want to learn in group discussion tomorrow is that if Kurt Vonnegut is supposed to be the actual narrator of the story since I think I may have missed it awhile back.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Frankenstein: Ending
I know most people were disappointed with the way the story ended. However, I actually enjoyed it. I don't know if it's weird to enjoy such a depressing ending but for some reason I liked it. I felt as though everything was resolved. While it may have been anti-climactic, Frankenstein dies in torment like the creature thought he wanted, and the creature dies like Victor would have wanted. The ending may not have been resolved like the way I expected, but I was satisfied with the result of the story. I really enjoyed seeing the revelation the creature had at the end. The ending really showed that deep down, the creature had been a good person but was just the target of hatred by society. Overall, I really enjoyed Frankenstein as it was my favorite work we've read so far, and I look forward to reading one of the novels we have been able to select.
Frankenstein vs. The Creature
"What does it avail that I now ask pardon of thee." p.163
Throughout this novel, I found myself sympathizing with both characters. However, if it came down to just choosing one character's side, I would have to go with the creature. All the creature wanted was just the slightest joy in his life and really never got any. Being constantly neglected and hurt would do the same to anyone in his shoes. Really, the fact that the creature was still sorry for what he did in the end after all the pain he'd been through conveys his inherently good nature. While I do think many of Victor's actions were commendable, his constant abuse towards his creation really seems to go against his values. Victor is flawed in this regard whereas the creature never had an inherent flaw. After simply being sick of seeing happiness around him and experiencing none, the creature became evil. Frankenstein was the cause for this which is why I find myself sympathizing with the creature more.
Throughout this novel, I found myself sympathizing with both characters. However, if it came down to just choosing one character's side, I would have to go with the creature. All the creature wanted was just the slightest joy in his life and really never got any. Being constantly neglected and hurt would do the same to anyone in his shoes. Really, the fact that the creature was still sorry for what he did in the end after all the pain he'd been through conveys his inherently good nature. While I do think many of Victor's actions were commendable, his constant abuse towards his creation really seems to go against his values. Victor is flawed in this regard whereas the creature never had an inherent flaw. After simply being sick of seeing happiness around him and experiencing none, the creature became evil. Frankenstein was the cause for this which is why I find myself sympathizing with the creature more.
Frankenstein: Irony and Suspense!
"I shall be with you on your wedding night" p.123
Oh the irony! This obviously is an indication that the creature is going after Elizabeth. It almost seems unrealistic that Shelley would not have Victor realize this. Anyway, this situation could simply be the definition of irony. The reader knows exactly who the creature will be after, yet Frankenstein has not the slightest clue. In addition to the irony in this quote, this really creates a lot of suspense in the book. I don't want to get too crazy with this blog entry with two literary devices, but this quote really does exhibit characteristics for both. As a reader, I was kept relatively interested throughout the book, however, when the creature said this, I couldn't wait to find out what would happen. This creepy quote from the creature really added to my enjoyment of the novel as well as to its excitement.
Oh the irony! This obviously is an indication that the creature is going after Elizabeth. It almost seems unrealistic that Shelley would not have Victor realize this. Anyway, this situation could simply be the definition of irony. The reader knows exactly who the creature will be after, yet Frankenstein has not the slightest clue. In addition to the irony in this quote, this really creates a lot of suspense in the book. I don't want to get too crazy with this blog entry with two literary devices, but this quote really does exhibit characteristics for both. As a reader, I was kept relatively interested throughout the book, however, when the creature said this, I couldn't wait to find out what would happen. This creepy quote from the creature really added to my enjoyment of the novel as well as to its excitement.
Dynamic Character
"A race of devils would be propagated upon the earth, who might make the very existence of the species of man a condition precarious and full of terror." p. 121
I think this is pretty obvious that Victor is a dynamic character in the story. There are many shifts and important changes that can be marked in his history. However, I feel as though one sticks out the most in significance. At the moment described in the quote above, Victor abandons his quest to create a second creature. This marks a turning point in the novel when Victor decides to transcend above a life of servitude for his own creation. Though it ends in his demise, this change in his character was key. He no longer cared about his own happiness but rather the well-being of the world. He thought it was now his duty to protect everyone around him. While the creature, it seems, had no evil plans with the second creation, Victor thought this may be the case and was willing to make sacrifices in order to attempt to protect others. Victor's dynamic shift elevates him from the slave-like control the creature previously had on him.
I think this is pretty obvious that Victor is a dynamic character in the story. There are many shifts and important changes that can be marked in his history. However, I feel as though one sticks out the most in significance. At the moment described in the quote above, Victor abandons his quest to create a second creature. This marks a turning point in the novel when Victor decides to transcend above a life of servitude for his own creation. Though it ends in his demise, this change in his character was key. He no longer cared about his own happiness but rather the well-being of the world. He thought it was now his duty to protect everyone around him. While the creature, it seems, had no evil plans with the second creation, Victor thought this may be the case and was willing to make sacrifices in order to attempt to protect others. Victor's dynamic shift elevates him from the slave-like control the creature previously had on him.
Frankenstein: Indirect Characterization
"I beheld a countenance of angelic beauty and expression. Her hair of a shining raven black, and curiously braided; her eyes were dark but gentle, although animated; her features of a regular proportion, and her complexion wondrously fair, each cheek tinged with a lovely pink." p.82
Indirect characterization is frequently the way in which Mary Shelley conveys the nature of the characters in the book. In the quote above, the creature is referring to the new found lady at the cottage named Safie. Safie conveniently is Turkish and, therefore, has yet to learn French. As the creature studies the habits of the cottagers, he is able to pick up on language much more quickly than before. This eventually gives him the opportunity to try his luck in friendship with the cottagers. The introduction and characterization was a key method in linking the history of the creature with his present being. While Safie is a brief and somewhat uninvolved character, she is key to the story. Through her, Shelley is able to progress the story through developing the creature's language as well as his outlook towards humanity. Because of this, Safie really does play a key role in advancing the story.
Indirect characterization is frequently the way in which Mary Shelley conveys the nature of the characters in the book. In the quote above, the creature is referring to the new found lady at the cottage named Safie. Safie conveniently is Turkish and, therefore, has yet to learn French. As the creature studies the habits of the cottagers, he is able to pick up on language much more quickly than before. This eventually gives him the opportunity to try his luck in friendship with the cottagers. The introduction and characterization was a key method in linking the history of the creature with his present being. While Safie is a brief and somewhat uninvolved character, she is key to the story. Through her, Shelley is able to progress the story through developing the creature's language as well as his outlook towards humanity. Because of this, Safie really does play a key role in advancing the story.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Frankenstein: My Opinion so far
I'm not the biggest fan of dedicating a lot of my time to books in general, but this book is by far the best we have read so far. I could actually see myself reading this outside of class shockingly... as long as I didn't have to take notes. I really have enjoyed the suspense and cliffhangers that close every chapter though. It definitely is a lot more interesting than any Shakespeare or plays we have read. So if it means anything to Mary Shelley, she gets a positive review from me. I'm really interested and intrigued as to how this story will unfold though. I especially want to know how it ends up getting to the point of a dogsled chase near the north pole. Obviously Victor and his creation never work things out, but I really want to see what happens next between them. So as it stands now, I'm really enjoying reading this book and hope I continue to do so.
Frankenstein: Allusion
"I ought to by thy Adam, but I am rather thy fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed." p.69
How did Frankenstein's creature reference a witty biblical allusion at age 2? That is the first question that comes to my mind. Obviously, he is a quick learner. However, this allusion is very significant in the story. It introduces the idea of God or creator/creation. In a way, Frankenstein should be obligated to take care of his creation like God. However, when the creation alludes to this, he twists it and shows how Victor has not done so. This really demonizes Victor in the mind of the reader for being so judgmental on the creature's appearance. Mary Shelley utilizes this such allusion to really change the readers initial perspective on these two characters in the story. I really am interested to see how significant a role this idea of creator/creation will play in the rest of the story and whether it will change Victor's current outlook on his creation at all.
How did Frankenstein's creature reference a witty biblical allusion at age 2? That is the first question that comes to my mind. Obviously, he is a quick learner. However, this allusion is very significant in the story. It introduces the idea of God or creator/creation. In a way, Frankenstein should be obligated to take care of his creation like God. However, when the creation alludes to this, he twists it and shows how Victor has not done so. This really demonizes Victor in the mind of the reader for being so judgmental on the creature's appearance. Mary Shelley utilizes this such allusion to really change the readers initial perspective on these two characters in the story. I really am interested to see how significant a role this idea of creator/creation will play in the rest of the story and whether it will change Victor's current outlook on his creation at all.
Frankenstein: Why is Victor so mean???
One thing that I have noticed is that Victor just seems like a horrible person. His so called wretched creature just wants a little compassion and Victor refuses it. At first, he doesn't even try to listen to his story and even tries to attack him. All his so far nameless creature wants is a little respect and dignity, yet Victor refuses any. I just think this doesn't bode too well for Victor's character in the court of my opinion. His creation seems like a good guy. I don't see why he won't just give him a chance. Because of this, I really find myself sympathizing with the creature and not really liking Victor anymore.
Frankenstein: Motif
"Poor William! He was our darling and our pride." p. 52
"Victory says that he knows who was the murderer of poor William." p. 53
Just like we witnessed in Othello with honest Iago, another motif arises in Frankenstein. Both quotes above display such motifs. Mary Shelley frequently has characters refer to William as poor William. This creates an aspect of additional innocence to William's already delicate and adolescent character. By using this motif, Shelley is able to create an atmosphere of increased tragedy from the already tragic nature of the event. This affects the reader in recognizing the horrid nature of such an action and creates an irreconcilable villain out of the murderer. With this, the reader can associate an evil nature with who is the actual murderer or even that of the accused. When Victor associates his creation with the murder, it immediately creates a demonic nature to the creature until this is later reconciled when they meet.
"Victory says that he knows who was the murderer of poor William." p. 53
Just like we witnessed in Othello with honest Iago, another motif arises in Frankenstein. Both quotes above display such motifs. Mary Shelley frequently has characters refer to William as poor William. This creates an aspect of additional innocence to William's already delicate and adolescent character. By using this motif, Shelley is able to create an atmosphere of increased tragedy from the already tragic nature of the event. This affects the reader in recognizing the horrid nature of such an action and creates an irreconcilable villain out of the murderer. With this, the reader can associate an evil nature with who is the actual murderer or even that of the accused. When Victor associates his creation with the murder, it immediately creates a demonic nature to the creature until this is later reconciled when they meet.
Frankenstein: Frame Story
"Strange and harrowing must be his story, frightful the storm which embraced the gallant vessel on its course and wrecked it- thus!" p.14
The quote above serves as the introduction/transition into Frankenstein's tale. This serves to illustrate and create a frame story format in which the plot is conveyed to the reader. As the book starts with letters, it transitions to the present and then to Victor's story. I'm interested to see if there will be a frame story within Victor's tale, but it doesn't look like this will be the case at least so far. However, I really enjoy this format of story. It always seems as though so much is happening and keeps my attention. There hasn't really been a lull in the progression of plot as I am always wondering what will unfold next. This frame story format really creates suspense and anticipation for the reader, especially in my case. I thought Shelly implamented this technique very well in attracting me, the reader, into the depth of the novel. I think this has been key to the success and popularity of the book in general throughout its history.
The quote above serves as the introduction/transition into Frankenstein's tale. This serves to illustrate and create a frame story format in which the plot is conveyed to the reader. As the book starts with letters, it transitions to the present and then to Victor's story. I'm interested to see if there will be a frame story within Victor's tale, but it doesn't look like this will be the case at least so far. However, I really enjoy this format of story. It always seems as though so much is happening and keeps my attention. There hasn't really been a lull in the progression of plot as I am always wondering what will unfold next. This frame story format really creates suspense and anticipation for the reader, especially in my case. I thought Shelly implamented this technique very well in attracting me, the reader, into the depth of the novel. I think this has been key to the success and popularity of the book in general throughout its history.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Death of a Salesman: Theme
"He had a good dream. It's the only dream you can have- to come out number-one man. He fought it out here and this is where I'm gonna win it for him." p.1630
One thing that I think I am struggling with for this play is the central theme. I was sick today, so I never got to address it with my group. I have a guess, but it is nothing I feel adequately addresses the whole play. I think that the theme can somewhat be conveyed in the quote above. This quote describes the obsession Happy and Willy have to always be number one in life. I think the theme is that trying to be the best always leaves oneself disappointed and short of their goal. Everyone can't honestly expect to be the best at what they do. It is a good goal to strive for, but it is something that only a few ever reach. I think Miller really tries to convey this through the characters Willy and Happy. They never are really satisfied with themselves because they never can feel accomplished in what they do. Biff begins to understand this towards the end of the play and wants to be accepted for who he is. As a result, he seems to be a more composed and level-headed character. Willy and Happy, on the other hand, struggle understanding this throughout the play. This essentially is summarized in what Happy says in the quote above. I don't think I'm too off track with this theme but hopefully my group can help me clarify it tomorrow.
One thing that I think I am struggling with for this play is the central theme. I was sick today, so I never got to address it with my group. I have a guess, but it is nothing I feel adequately addresses the whole play. I think that the theme can somewhat be conveyed in the quote above. This quote describes the obsession Happy and Willy have to always be number one in life. I think the theme is that trying to be the best always leaves oneself disappointed and short of their goal. Everyone can't honestly expect to be the best at what they do. It is a good goal to strive for, but it is something that only a few ever reach. I think Miller really tries to convey this through the characters Willy and Happy. They never are really satisfied with themselves because they never can feel accomplished in what they do. Biff begins to understand this towards the end of the play and wants to be accepted for who he is. As a result, he seems to be a more composed and level-headed character. Willy and Happy, on the other hand, struggle understanding this throughout the play. This essentially is summarized in what Happy says in the quote above. I don't think I'm too off track with this theme but hopefully my group can help me clarify it tomorrow.
Death of a Salesman: Irony
"Why didn't anybody come? It was a nice funeral. But where are all the people he knew?" p.1629
Wow I definitely did not expect such an irony like this to end the play. The entire focus of the character Willy is his impressions on other people. He goes about his whole life trying to be well-liked by everyone. He even raises his two sons in this manner. He thinks that success is directly correlated with how many people like you and how well-known you are. Nothing could be more ironic than having only two people outside his family show up to his funeral. All his life Charley had been there for him and still is at his funeral. However, it is ironic that Charley, who never pushed success on his own son, has a son who ended up being the most successful out of all of the characters. It is very ironic for practically no one to pay their respects to Willy at his funeral, and it is even more ironic that the two who do are Charley and Bernard.
Wow I definitely did not expect such an irony like this to end the play. The entire focus of the character Willy is his impressions on other people. He goes about his whole life trying to be well-liked by everyone. He even raises his two sons in this manner. He thinks that success is directly correlated with how many people like you and how well-known you are. Nothing could be more ironic than having only two people outside his family show up to his funeral. All his life Charley had been there for him and still is at his funeral. However, it is ironic that Charley, who never pushed success on his own son, has a son who ended up being the most successful out of all of the characters. It is very ironic for practically no one to pay their respects to Willy at his funeral, and it is even more ironic that the two who do are Charley and Bernard.
Death of a Salesman: Parallels with the Glass Menagerie
"Can you imagine that magnificence with twenty thousand dollars in his pocket?" p.1627
This quote from the story pretty much summarizes one of the key aspects of the play. Willy has good intentions for his son, Biff. He wants him to be the best he can be, however, his intentions are often misguided. He tries to convince Biff that in order to be successful, he has to be popular and loved by everyone. This irrational view distorts Biff's life as he grows up trying to be the best at everything. This quote from Willy shows that he never truly moved on from the idea that Biff has to be great in whatever he does. Willy goes on to kill himself just to give Biff a chance to start a business, something Biff doesn't even want to do. Willy has good intentions, however, they are just really misguided. This parallels with the character Amanda from the "Glass Menagerie". Like Willy, she wanted what was best for Laura but often went about in the wrong way of doing it. Both characters were stuck in their past and never really accepted their children for who they were, but rather what they expected them to be. I found these two plays to be very similar in the many parallels among characters.
This quote from the story pretty much summarizes one of the key aspects of the play. Willy has good intentions for his son, Biff. He wants him to be the best he can be, however, his intentions are often misguided. He tries to convince Biff that in order to be successful, he has to be popular and loved by everyone. This irrational view distorts Biff's life as he grows up trying to be the best at everything. This quote from Willy shows that he never truly moved on from the idea that Biff has to be great in whatever he does. Willy goes on to kill himself just to give Biff a chance to start a business, something Biff doesn't even want to do. Willy has good intentions, however, they are just really misguided. This parallels with the character Amanda from the "Glass Menagerie". Like Willy, she wanted what was best for Laura but often went about in the wrong way of doing it. Both characters were stuck in their past and never really accepted their children for who they were, but rather what they expected them to be. I found these two plays to be very similar in the many parallels among characters.
Monday, February 27, 2012
The Glass Menagerie: Personal Reflection
I usually end up using one of my blogs to discuss my own opinions of the plays we read so here it goes again. Unique is a word that I would use to describe this play. It is really unorthodox in its styles such as its use of nonrealism as the basis for forming characters and virtually everything. I really never have read a play that implements so much nonrealistic material and then uses this to include and exclude certain details to fit the themes. It actually really is enjoyable to read something so different after having to read the typical Shakespeare works in old, poetic English. It definitely is a relief not constantly struggling to figure out what something means or even symbolizes now. Williams literally tells the reader what everything means and in simple language. It honestly doesn't get much better for me, the student. I'd like to think that the reason I like this play so much isn't because it is so easy to follow, but I do know much of it has to do with that. However, the way this play is unfolding and the relationships among characters has made it even more enjoyable for me as well. I'm really interested to see what happens next as I spend the rest of the night finishing up the reading.
The Glass Menagerie: Realistic vs. Nonrealistic
"The scene is memory and is therefore nonrealistic. Memory takes a lot of poetic license. It omits some details; others are exaggerated..." p. 1235
This play really addresses the difference between realistic and nonrealistic conventions. As directly cited in the quote, the play almost always uses nonrealistic conventions because of its memory-based recollection. Tennessee Williams goes into extraordinary detail in describing the settings. This gives the reader a clear understanding of theme and interpretation of meanings. There really is not much up for debate among symbolism. With these descriptions comes the use of nonrealistic conventions in the play. Realism is totally absent in the play because of the way the story is told and even through Williams' stage directions. I thought this was very interesting considering the unique nature in which this play is narrated. I've really never seen these rare and unconventional styles so often outside of this play. I'm interested to see how Williams continues to utilize these tools to develop the story as well as the characters.
This play really addresses the difference between realistic and nonrealistic conventions. As directly cited in the quote, the play almost always uses nonrealistic conventions because of its memory-based recollection. Tennessee Williams goes into extraordinary detail in describing the settings. This gives the reader a clear understanding of theme and interpretation of meanings. There really is not much up for debate among symbolism. With these descriptions comes the use of nonrealistic conventions in the play. Realism is totally absent in the play because of the way the story is told and even through Williams' stage directions. I thought this was very interesting considering the unique nature in which this play is narrated. I've really never seen these rare and unconventional styles so often outside of this play. I'm interested to see how Williams continues to utilize these tools to develop the story as well as the characters.
The Glass Menagerie: Theme
"A fragile, unearthly prettiness has come out in Laura; she is like a piece of translucent glass touched by light, given a momentary radiance, not actual, not lasting." p.1263
Already from reading up until scene 7, the notion that brief happiness will end is evident. Laura is a fragile character who, like her character, enjoys fragile things. Playing with her glass ornaments really conveys her personality and who she is. I am starting to recognize a pattern in a theme that brief fragile happiness will eventually shatter. As the description of Laura in the quote illuminates, Laura is like one of her glass ornaments. She is beautiful in the moment, but the description foreshadows that this brief world will come crashing down. Many supports from the text indicate that this will be the case. This thematic message seems to be playing a key role in driving the action of the plot thus far and seems to indicate the outcome of the play to come.
Already from reading up until scene 7, the notion that brief happiness will end is evident. Laura is a fragile character who, like her character, enjoys fragile things. Playing with her glass ornaments really conveys her personality and who she is. I am starting to recognize a pattern in a theme that brief fragile happiness will eventually shatter. As the description of Laura in the quote illuminates, Laura is like one of her glass ornaments. She is beautiful in the moment, but the description foreshadows that this brief world will come crashing down. Many supports from the text indicate that this will be the case. This thematic message seems to be playing a key role in driving the action of the plot thus far and seems to indicate the outcome of the play to come.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
As You Like It: Question 1 (p. 1119)
"He was to imagine me his love, his mistress; and I set him everyday to woo me." III.ii.p.45
This question touches on whether or not the play employs realistic or unrealistic conventions. I think this scene sums up how unrealistic the play really is. It is very unrealistic that Rosalind, the woman Orlando is madly in love with, is able to just dress up as a man and talk to him without any suspicion. If her disguise didn't already give it away, the dialogue would have to force Orlando to recognize her. Rosalind, as her alter ego, is literally teaching Orlando how to treat and act around her. To me, it just seemed way too unrealistic that this could actually happen without Orlando catching on. In addition to this, the fact that Duke Frederick has a change of heart on a whim when talking to a religious man seems very unrealistic as well. It completely changes the play, and the dialogue between them wasn't even in it; it was simply summarized by another character. Because of all these things, I felt that the play was very unrealistic at times which unfortunately led me to lose a lot of interest in it as well.
This question touches on whether or not the play employs realistic or unrealistic conventions. I think this scene sums up how unrealistic the play really is. It is very unrealistic that Rosalind, the woman Orlando is madly in love with, is able to just dress up as a man and talk to him without any suspicion. If her disguise didn't already give it away, the dialogue would have to force Orlando to recognize her. Rosalind, as her alter ego, is literally teaching Orlando how to treat and act around her. To me, it just seemed way too unrealistic that this could actually happen without Orlando catching on. In addition to this, the fact that Duke Frederick has a change of heart on a whim when talking to a religious man seems very unrealistic as well. It completely changes the play, and the dialogue between them wasn't even in it; it was simply summarized by another character. Because of all these things, I felt that the play was very unrealistic at times which unfortunately led me to lose a lot of interest in it as well.
As You Like It: Comedy vs. Tragedy
Before this play, I thought I was going to be relieved to read something not so depressing. However, that definitely is not the case. I thought I would like the change, but I don't. In this comedy, the plot just really lagged and wasn't exciting at all. At least in tragedies, I tried to figure out who was going to be the last man standing. This comedy just felt far-fetched and uneventful. This is just my opinion, but the comedy "As You Like It" was not funny at all. Comedy really has come a long way over time. I'm glad Shakespeare tried though. There were ironic situations that were somewhat comedic, but to me, I'd rather read a tragedy where it seems like there's so much more plot and substance to it.
As You Like It: Theme (Question 5 p. 1119)
"In brief, he led me to the gentle Duke, who gave me fresh array and entertainment, committing me unto my brother's love." V.iii.p.65
I think for this blog I'm going to use the theme you gave us in class of love heals. In a play that really lacked a true theme and plot, I felt that this was an accurate assignment of a theme to the play. It reoccurs in several cases. For instance, as depicted in the quote, love is used as a healing force between Orlando and Oliver's relationship. In addition to this, it was also able to convert Duke Frederick from a tyrannical Duke to a religious man of God. With all these instances of this occurring, it is obvious Shakespeare was trying to make a point through it. To be honest, I didn't get a whole lot in terms of theme and meaning in this play, but I do think that Shakespeare tried to convey how love is a healing force that fixes broken relationships. It did not have a huge impact on the dramatic experience as a whole but it did impact certain details that were able to drive the action.
I think for this blog I'm going to use the theme you gave us in class of love heals. In a play that really lacked a true theme and plot, I felt that this was an accurate assignment of a theme to the play. It reoccurs in several cases. For instance, as depicted in the quote, love is used as a healing force between Orlando and Oliver's relationship. In addition to this, it was also able to convert Duke Frederick from a tyrannical Duke to a religious man of God. With all these instances of this occurring, it is obvious Shakespeare was trying to make a point through it. To be honest, I didn't get a whole lot in terms of theme and meaning in this play, but I do think that Shakespeare tried to convey how love is a healing force that fixes broken relationships. It did not have a huge impact on the dramatic experience as a whole but it did impact certain details that were able to drive the action.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Othello Reflective Essay Interactive Blog
In addition to drawing parallels with “A Separate Peace”, “Othello” also connects to the recent motion picture “The Town.” “Othello” can be seen as timeless through Iago’s similarities to the character, Doug. In this film, he is a ruthless bank robber that comes from a neighborhood of crime (Affleck). Frequently threatening others, Doug lacks the noble and heroic qualities of the standard protagonist. However, he is able to gain the viewer’s sympathy and support much like Iago is able to
do in “Othello.” As Doug carries out his last robberies, he becomes a victim of his own crimes as he ends up harming those he loves the most (Affleck). Even though he is breaking the law and stealing from others, in this moment, the viewer takes the side of Doug and feels sympathy for him. This notion of a flawed, and even evil, yet likeable protagonist is something that Shakespeare conveyed 500 years ago, and it still applies to literature and popular media today. Whether it is in “A Separate Peace” or “The Town”, reoccurring themes and attributes from “Othello” can be seen today among many literary works. This is what makes “Othello” such a significant part of literary history: its timeless and universal nature.
Perrine , Laurence. “Othello.” Perrine ’s Literature:
Many of Shakespeare’s works are viewed today as being universal and timeless pieces of literature. His tragedy, “Othello,” is yet another example of a universal piece of literature that continues to apply generation after generation to all of humanity. The play, “Othello”, remains a cross-cultural and lasting work for many reasons. One aspect of the play that reoccurs throughout various works in literature, films, and even television shows today has been the unique character type of the protagonist. While in many films and books, the protagonist appears to be a heroic and moral character combating some evil opposition, in Othello however, this is not the case. The main character, Iago, lacks moral qualities and is an evil protagonist. This style of character as the protagonist, though rare, can be seen time and time again in modern books whether in the character, Gene, from “A Separate Peace” or even in the movies with the character, Doug, from the motion picture “The Town.” Each of these characters combats the typical notion of a flawless protagonist through their own ways.
 |
| This image displays the tree that Gene knocked Finny out of because of his jealously he had for him. |
The character, Gene, from “A Separate Peace” parallels with Iago in many ways. Like all protagonists, Gene drives the action of the story. However, one thing that sets Gene’s character apart from others and what makes him similar to Iago is his anti-heroic qualities. Gene finds himself in a jealous struggle that leads him to knock his best friend, whom he envies, out of a tree, thus breaking his leg (Knowles). Gene’s plot of jealousy eventually leads to the regrettable death of his best friend, Finny. Just like Shakespeare’s character Iago did in “Othello”, Gene carries out evil acts that go against the typical heroic qualities of a protagonist. However, as the protagonist, Gene is able to obtain sympathy from the reader over his own insecurities. Iago, though not a completely sympathetic character, did receive sympathy when Othello refused to promote him even after his long years of service (Othello, I.i.8-33). Because of this, the character Iago is able to convey the notion of Shakespeare’s timeless and reoccurring work “Othello” through his paralleling attributes with the modern character Gene.
 Doug may be a bank robber, but as the viewer gets to know him well, they will inevitably root for his success. |
do in “Othello.” As Doug carries out his last robberies, he becomes a victim of his own crimes as he ends up harming those he loves the most (Affleck). Even though he is breaking the law and stealing from others, in this moment, the viewer takes the side of Doug and feels sympathy for him. This notion of a flawed, and even evil, yet likeable protagonist is something that Shakespeare conveyed 500 years ago, and it still applies to literature and popular media today. Whether it is in “A Separate Peace” or “The Town”, reoccurring themes and attributes from “Othello” can be seen today among many literary works. This is what makes “Othello” such a significant part of literary history: its timeless and universal nature.
Works Cited
Knowles, John, and Alan C. Coman. "Chapter 4." A Seperate Peace. Agincourt: Book Society of Canada
Craig, Peter, Ben Affleck, and Aaron Stockard. The Town. Dir. Ben Affleck. 17 Sept. 2010. Television.
Structures, Sound, and Sense. Fort Worth Harcourt College
1361-462. Print.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Othello Song Reflection
The song that I have chosen to represent the conflict between Othello and Desdemona is "Faithfully" by journey. Throughout the entire play, Desdemona remained loyal to Othello to the point of death. Even when he threatened her life and eventually took it, Desdemona remained obedient and faithful to her husband. Because of actions like this, I think this song describes the relationship Othello and Desdemona had. The song's chorus states "I'm forever yours, faithfully." This really conveys the gist of their relationship in the fact that Desdemona never cheated on Othello and had even stood by him as he wrongfully killed her. She behaved as though she was truly forever his wife in life and in death. Because of the parallels between the song and situation, I think that this song accurately portrays the complex and indirect relationship Desdemona and Othello had.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rj__jhmPMgI - video
http://www.metrolyrics.com/faithfully-lyrics-journey.html -lyrics
http://www.metrolyrics.com/faithfully-lyrics-journey.html -lyrics
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Othello: Overall Reflection
"Blow me about in winds! Roast me in sulphur! Wash me in steep-down gulfs of liquid fire! O Desdemona! Desdemona! Dead! Oh! Oh! Oh!" V.ii.278-281
I'm starting to think that Shakespeare simply hates happiness. Every play of his ends in everything that could have gone wrong going wrong. The quote above depicts the final parts of the play where everything, in the eyes of the audience, just goes wrong. Whether you were rooting for Othello or Iago, both parties end up losing. It really just no longer shocks me after all the Shakesperian plays I've read. Othello was yet another one of Shakespeare's tragedies that followed this course. However, despite the way things turned out, I actually enjoyed this play. It probably is my favorite play of Shakespeare that I have read and one of my favorite works we've studied this year. Now that it's over, I'm interested to see others thoughts on the story and whether they enjoyed it or not.
I'm starting to think that Shakespeare simply hates happiness. Every play of his ends in everything that could have gone wrong going wrong. The quote above depicts the final parts of the play where everything, in the eyes of the audience, just goes wrong. Whether you were rooting for Othello or Iago, both parties end up losing. It really just no longer shocks me after all the Shakesperian plays I've read. Othello was yet another one of Shakespeare's tragedies that followed this course. However, despite the way things turned out, I actually enjoyed this play. It probably is my favorite play of Shakespeare that I have read and one of my favorite works we've studied this year. Now that it's over, I'm interested to see others thoughts on the story and whether they enjoyed it or not.
Othello: Question 5 Response
"O thou weed, Who art so lovely fair and smell'st sweet That the sense aches at thee, would thou hadst ne'er been born!" IV.ii. 67-69
Theme was a trouble for me to identify in this play. It seemed as though it was Iago planning to kill everyone, and then even more people were killed than he expected. Where's the theme in that? I'm hoping someone will be able to enlighten me on the theme of the play tomorrow. Really, I only have a slight guess as to what it may be. The play is obviously a tragedy, but I wonder if the theme could be tragic as well. It seems to be a reocurring "theme" in Shakespeare's plays and is especially shown in Othello. If the theme is simply the tragedy of human error, then the theme is the driving force behind the entire play. Each action Iago makes to advance the plot is based upon Othello's tragic flaw. The quote above shows Othello's tragic flaw in which he has been convinced unfoundedly by Iago that Desdemona has been cheating on him. Hopefully I'm not too far off on this one.
Theme was a trouble for me to identify in this play. It seemed as though it was Iago planning to kill everyone, and then even more people were killed than he expected. Where's the theme in that? I'm hoping someone will be able to enlighten me on the theme of the play tomorrow. Really, I only have a slight guess as to what it may be. The play is obviously a tragedy, but I wonder if the theme could be tragic as well. It seems to be a reocurring "theme" in Shakespeare's plays and is especially shown in Othello. If the theme is simply the tragedy of human error, then the theme is the driving force behind the entire play. Each action Iago makes to advance the plot is based upon Othello's tragic flaw. The quote above shows Othello's tragic flaw in which he has been convinced unfoundedly by Iago that Desdemona has been cheating on him. Hopefully I'm not too far off on this one.
Othello: Question 2 Response
"I kissed thee ere I killed thee. No way but this, Killing myself, to die upon a kiss. (Falls on the bed and dies)" V.ii.357-358
Since it is a Shakesperian play, I think it would be a good guess to categorize Othello as a tragedy. Almost every character the audience knew ended up dying with the exception of Cassio, who barely managed to survive. As usual, there is always a central character with a tragic flaw which eventually results in his demise. Shakespere's play names tend to be the name of the main character, whom the audience knows best,. One thing I saw different about this tragedy is that it focused almost soley on Iago's actions rather than Othello. The audience only knew Iago's deepest thoughts. This poses the question of why not name the play Iago. My guess is that it is because Othello is the tragic character with his gullible and trusting nature leading to his demise. Because of this, Othello is the real reason for the play being a tragedy, thus having the play named after him like all the rest of Shakespeare's works.
Since it is a Shakesperian play, I think it would be a good guess to categorize Othello as a tragedy. Almost every character the audience knew ended up dying with the exception of Cassio, who barely managed to survive. As usual, there is always a central character with a tragic flaw which eventually results in his demise. Shakespere's play names tend to be the name of the main character, whom the audience knows best,. One thing I saw different about this tragedy is that it focused almost soley on Iago's actions rather than Othello. The audience only knew Iago's deepest thoughts. This poses the question of why not name the play Iago. My guess is that it is because Othello is the tragic character with his gullible and trusting nature leading to his demise. Because of this, Othello is the real reason for the play being a tragedy, thus having the play named after him like all the rest of Shakespeare's works.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Othello: First 3 Acts Personal Reflection
"I am your own for ever."
III.iii.481
Short and sweet and to the point. I'd say that's what this quote represents. It is so simple and short yet describes the entire play all too well. Iago here, yet again, is lying and is using calculated speech to gain influence. It actually sounds extremely creepy in a way, but Iago says this as just another means to prove his trustworthiness to Othello. Just before he said this, Othello promoted him to lieutenant, so obviously his lies are paying off. It's a little ironic that the word LIE can be found in his new title. Anyway, Iago is just executing his plan step by step without ever failing. He just has been promoted, but it would shock me if that was his goal this whole time. It seems Iago has more tricks up his sleeve that he will soon reveal in his calculated fight for power. I've never been a fan of Shakespeare, but I'm genuinely interested to see how the rest of the play will unfold.
III.iii.481
Short and sweet and to the point. I'd say that's what this quote represents. It is so simple and short yet describes the entire play all too well. Iago here, yet again, is lying and is using calculated speech to gain influence. It actually sounds extremely creepy in a way, but Iago says this as just another means to prove his trustworthiness to Othello. Just before he said this, Othello promoted him to lieutenant, so obviously his lies are paying off. It's a little ironic that the word LIE can be found in his new title. Anyway, Iago is just executing his plan step by step without ever failing. He just has been promoted, but it would shock me if that was his goal this whole time. It seems Iago has more tricks up his sleeve that he will soon reveal in his calculated fight for power. I've never been a fan of Shakespeare, but I'm genuinely interested to see how the rest of the play will unfold.
Othello: p.1119 Question 4 Response
"Tis evermore the prologue to his sleep. He'll watch the harolage a double set, if drink not his cradle."
II.iii.109-113
Okay so this quote doesn't exactly create suspense in the play, but I thought it embodied the character who does. Iago is the driving force behind the action of the play. He has revealed small parts of his plan to the audience but not its entirety. This is the suspense of the play. The audience is constantly trying to figure out what Iago will do next to set his plan in motion. In this excerpt, Iago is carrying out yet another calculated lie to progress this plan. This is where the suspense comes from. As a reader, I keep wondering what sick purpose or action these lies will set into motion. While the audience knows little of Iago's plan, the other characters have not the slightest clue. They even describe Iago as honest frequently! This contrast in the perceptions of Iago and his true character generate suspense for the audience who is constantly trying to figure out what Iago has in mind.
II.iii.109-113
Okay so this quote doesn't exactly create suspense in the play, but I thought it embodied the character who does. Iago is the driving force behind the action of the play. He has revealed small parts of his plan to the audience but not its entirety. This is the suspense of the play. The audience is constantly trying to figure out what Iago will do next to set his plan in motion. In this excerpt, Iago is carrying out yet another calculated lie to progress this plan. This is where the suspense comes from. As a reader, I keep wondering what sick purpose or action these lies will set into motion. While the audience knows little of Iago's plan, the other characters have not the slightest clue. They even describe Iago as honest frequently! This contrast in the perceptions of Iago and his true character generate suspense for the audience who is constantly trying to figure out what Iago has in mind.
Othello: p.1119 Question 3 Response
"I know not that, but such a handkerchief- I am sure it was your wife's- did I today see Cassio wipe his beard with." III.iii.437-439
This quote is from the antagonist of the story, Iago and is directed towards the protagonist, Othello. Othello seems to be the protagonist, however, the story focuses and is told from Iago's perspective and driving action. The audience is given more insight into Iago's character and motives through his soliloquies and aside comments. These differences among the protagonist and antagonist, though Othello knows nothing of, create foil characters in the story. Though Cassio is not as noble as Othello in his actions, his true character and idealogy are very similar to Othello. This serves to contrast Iago from Othello and demonize his actions. Cassio's role as a minor character is one of the centerpieces for Iago's not fully revealed plan and influences key action in the play. This minor role is essential in shedding light on the true intentions of Iago's plan.
This quote is from the antagonist of the story, Iago and is directed towards the protagonist, Othello. Othello seems to be the protagonist, however, the story focuses and is told from Iago's perspective and driving action. The audience is given more insight into Iago's character and motives through his soliloquies and aside comments. These differences among the protagonist and antagonist, though Othello knows nothing of, create foil characters in the story. Though Cassio is not as noble as Othello in his actions, his true character and idealogy are very similar to Othello. This serves to contrast Iago from Othello and demonize his actions. Cassio's role as a minor character is one of the centerpieces for Iago's not fully revealed plan and influences key action in the play. This minor role is essential in shedding light on the true intentions of Iago's plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)